The Patagonian steppe is composed mainly of shrubs and tussock grasses organized in two types of patches: (1) scattered grass tussocks in a matrix of bare soil and (2) shrubs, each surrounded by a dense ring of grass tussocks. We analyzed the variation of competition, facilitation, and seed distribution through space and time as major driving forces in the development of this patch structure. Emergence and survival of grass seedlings increased with distance from shrubs when the ring of grasses was left intact. On the contrary, when the ring of grasses was experimentally removed, seedling survival decreased with distance from the shrub. Differences in root density, soil water potential, and evaporation accounted for these patterns. Density of naturally dispersed seeds of grasses decreased with distance from the shrub. Simulated recruitment near shrubs without the ring of grasses was twice as high as near shrubs with the ring. High root competition near the shrubs surrounded by a ring of grasses decreased the survivability of seedlings and overshadowed the aerial protection provided by the shrubs. We suggest that when shrubs are young and small, facilitation is more important than competition which results in the formation of the dense ring of grasses. When the shrub becomes large and the ring complete, competition overshadows facilitation. After shrub death, the ring may disintegrate and remnant tussocks may form the other patch type, scattered grass tussocks.
Oikos is a journal issued by the Nordic Ecological Society and is one of the leading peer-reviewed journals in ecology. Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers should be well founded in ecological theory and contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical experimental results. Confirming or extending the established literature is given less priority. Synthesis of new and emerging fields in ecology and beyond is encouraged. Papers of review character should should strive for conceptual unification and being a point of departure for future work rather that restrospective summaries of established fields or topics.
Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Oikos
© 1994 Nordic Society Oikos