Using administrative data from the University of California at San Diego, the author explicitly identifies and studies students admitted under affirmative action programs. On average, these students earned grade point averages (GPAs) 0.30 points lower than those of nonaffirmative students. The difference in graduation rates is larger, with 57% of affirmative action students graduating compared to 73% of their nonaffirmative action peers. When compared to students just above the regular admissions cutoff, the differences are smaller-the difference in graduation rates is only 8 percentage points, and the difference in GPAs is only 0.20 points. A student's family, school, and neighborhood characteristics can explain a small part of these differences, but academic preparation explains most of the difference.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (EEPA) publishes scholarly articles concerned with important issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of education policy. EEPA is open to all of the diverse methodologies and theoretical orientations represented in AERA published work. We welcome submissions focused on international and comparative policy issues in education as well as domestic issues.
The American Educational Research Association (AERA) is concerned with improving the educational process by encouraging scholarly inquiry related to education and by promoting the dissemination and practical application of research results. AERA is the most prominent international professional organization with the primary goal of advancing educational research and its practical application. Its 20,000 members are educators; administrators; directors of research, testing or evaluation in federal, state and local agencies; counselors; evaluators; graduate students; and behavioral scientists. The broad range of disciplines represented by the membership includes education, psychology, statistics, sociology, history, economics, philosophy, anthropology, and political science.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
© 2005 American Educational Research Association
Request Permissions
