The purpose of the Review of Agricultural Economics (RAE) is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and empirical findings among those working in various areas of agricultural economics. These areas include extension education, resident instruction, applied economic and policy analysis, and decision-support analysis. Published articles are expected to be valuable to applied economists working in the public, private, and nonprofit sectors, both domestic and international. In this regard, this publication is unique among the scholarly agricultural economics journals. The editors take seriously the challenge to evaluate manuscripts for publication based on readability and broad interest to all subscribers. The Review of Agricultural Economics is published jointly by the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, the Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, the Western Agricultural Economics Association, and the American Agricultural Economics Association. The RAE is published quarterly.
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Review of Agricultural Economics
© 2006 Wiley