This paper describes the economic policy and economic performance of Brazil during the first Lula administration, in 2003-2006. I show that in his first term as president Lula chose fast disinflation as one of the main priority of its economic policy. This choice required the adoption of high real interest rates, which also demanded an increase in the government's primary surplus to keep the country's public debt under control. Consequently, as I strive to demonstrate, investment in social safety net (the administration's other main priority) was financed not only by the increase in tax revenues but also by a reduction in the government's expenditure on both wages and benefits of public employees and in public investments in infrastructure. A combination of, on the one hand, a favorable global environment and, on the other, successful economic policies resulted in a significant improvement in the Brazilian macroeconomic performance. This in turn contributed a great deal to a reduction in both income inequality and poverty rates. I conclude by unveiling what I view as a quite unusual economic arrangement: president Lula's economic choices over the 2003-2006 period ended up benefiting most the extremely rich (through high real interest rates) and the very poor (through the increase in income transfers).
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society publishes original peer-reviewed papers on issues that arise at the intersections of nations, states, civil societies, and global institutions and processes. Themes examined in the journal include: changing patterns in world economic and political institutions; new configurations of ethnic groups, social classes, religions, personal networks, and special interests; the social effects of changes in mass culture, propaganda, and technologies of communication; and the impact of social transformations on the changing order of public and private life. The journal is interdisciplinary in orientation and international in scope. It is not tied to any theoretical or research tradition and encourages articles of varying length, from research notes to article-length monographs.
Springer is one of the leading international scientific publishing companies, publishing over 1,200 journals and more than 3,000 new books annually, covering a wide range of subjects including biomedicine and the life sciences, clinical medicine, physics, engineering, mathematics, computer sciences, and economics.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society
© 2008 Springer
Request Permissions