With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Already have an account?
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Purchase a PDF
How does it work?
- Select the purchase option.
-
Check out using a credit card or bank account with
PayPal . - Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.
We tested whether the efficacy of chemical weed control might change as atmospheric CO₂ concentration [CO₂] increases by determining if tolerance to a widely used, phloem mobile, postemergence herbicide, glyphosate, was altered by a doubling of [CO₂]. Tolerance was determined by following the growth of Amaranthus retroflexus L. (redroot pigweed), a C₄ species, and Chenopodium album L. (common lambsquarters), a C₃ species, grown at near ambient (360 μmol mol⁻¹) and twice ambient (720 μmol mol⁻¹) [CO₂] for 14 d following glyphosate application at rates of 0.00 (control), (0.112 kg ai ha⁻¹) (0.1 × the commercial rate), and 1.12 kg ai ha⁻¹ (1.0 × the commercial rate) in four separate trials. Irrespective of [CO₂], growth of the C₄ species, A. retroflexus, was significantly reduced and was eliminated altogether at glyphosate application rates of 0.112 and 1.12 kg ai ha⁻¹, respectively. However, in contrast to the ambient [CO₂] treatment, an application rate of 0.112 kg ai ha⁻¹ had no effect on growth, and a 1.12-kg ai ha⁻¹ rate reduced but did not eliminate growth in elevated [CO₂]-grown C. album. Although glyphosate tolerance does increase with plant size at the time of application, differences in glyphosate tolerance between CO₂ treatments in C. album cannot be explained by size alone. These data indicate that rising atmospheric [CO₂] could increase glyphosate tolerance in a C₃ weedy species. Changes in herbicide tolerance at elevated [CO₂] could limite chemical weed control efficacy and increase weed-crop competition.
Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship focused on understanding "why" phenomena occur. As such, it focuses on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science.
Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Weed Science
© 1999 Cambridge University Press