In a survey of UK consumers, we elicited their willingness to accept (WTA) a discount for GM foods and willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for non-GM foods in order to assess their valuation of the non-GM characteristic in food products. Mean WTA is found to exceed mean WTP, suggesting the valuation of the non-GM characteristic reflects an endowment effect, imperfect substitutability between GM and non-GM foods, or both. Regression results show that perceived risks (benefits) associated with GM foods significantly increase (decrease) WTA and WTP estimates. Additional regression models using the difference between WTA and WTP as the dependent variable indicate that risk (benefit) perceptions increased (decreased) the discrepancy between WTA and WTP estimates. The role of risk perceptions in explaining this discrepancy is congruent with consumers' propensity toward loss aversion as predicted by the endowment effect hypothesis and prospect theory.
The mission of the Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics is to publish creative and scholarly economic studies in agriculture, natural resources, and related areas. Manuscripts dealing with the economics of food and agriculture, natural resources and the environment, human resources, and rural development issues are especially encouraged. The Journal provides a forum for topics of interest to those performing economic research as well as to those involved with economic policy and education. Submission of comments on articles previously published in the Journal is welcomed.
The objectives and purpose of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, Inc shall be: To foster the study and understanding of agricultural economics and its application to problems in the western United States and Canada; To promote unity and effectiveness of effort among all concerned with those problems; To promote improvement in the professional competence and standards of all members;To cooperate with other organizations and institutions engaged in similar or related activities; and To increase the contribution of agricultural economics to human welfare.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
© 2007 Western Agricultural Economics Association