Harvard Ukrainian Studies (HUS), the journal of the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, serves as a forum for new scholarship in Ukrainian studies. It deals primarily with history, language, and literature; at times related disciplines are included. HUS encourages scholars specializing in Ukrainian studies, as well as scholars working in related areas, to investigate and analyze issues important to the field. The journal cultivates an interdisciplinary approach that places Ukrainian topics in a broad scholarly context. It publishes articles, documents with analysis or interpretation, and reviews.  

The Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute forms a vital component of Harvard University's international studies community. The Institute's mission is to advance knowledge about Ukraine in the United States through research and teaching in the fields of history, philology, literature, and the social sciences. HURI also fosters the study of all religious and ethnic groups that live in Ukraine, bridges between Ukrainian studies and the study of Russia, Poland, Turkey, Belarus, and Moldova, and maintains close relations with Ukraine's cultural and academic institutions. The Institute's programs are supported by three endowed professors in Ukrainian history, philology, and literature, and associated faculty and students at Harvard and other academic institutions. HURI also publishes scholarly monographs and the journal Harvard Ukrainian Studies. The Institute maintains a reference library, archives, and a seminar series in Ukrainian Studies. The Institute organizes the Harvard Ukrainian Summer Institute, which is part of the Harvard Summer School.  

This item is part of JSTOR collection
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Harvard Ukrainian Studies © 1996 The President and Fellows of Harvard College
Request Permissions