Fernando Henrique Cardoso has been the president of the Federative Republic of Brazil since January 1, 1995. He was reelected in 1998 in the first elections round, with 53% of the vote. Prior to becoming a public figure, sociologist Fernando Henrique Cardoso had a successful career in academia. He was associate director of the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris, and visiting professor at the Collège de France and the University of Paris-Nanterre. He also taught at Cambridge, Stanford, and Berkeley. He was chairman of the International Sociology Association (ISA), 1982-1986. He is currently professor emeritus at the São Paulo University. He has published many articles, both in Brazil and abroad, chief among which are "Mudanças sociais na América latina" ("Social Changes in Latin America"), "Dependency and Development in Latin America" (with Enzo Faletto), "Política e Desenvolvimento em Sociedades Dependentes" ("Politics and Development in Dependent Societies"), and "A Construção da Democracia" ("The Building of Democracy"). Fernando Henrique Cardoso's political career began with his election as senator. A co-founder of Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira (PSDB, The Party of Brazilian Social-Democracy) in 1988, he led the party's senatorial front until 1992. He was appointed minister of foreign relations and of finance before his election to the presidency. As finance minister, Cardoso was the architect of the so-called "Real Plan," a recovery strategy to bail out the country's ailing economy. Enormously successful, the plan controlled Brazil's runaway inflation. As president, he promoted numerous reforms, including measures in pursuit of monetary stability, the privatization of state monopolies, and the reduction of trade restrictions. His permanent focus, as the interview below will reveal, has been reducing social inequities in Brazil.
Effective with the February, 2006 issue the Academy of Management Executive has changed its name to the Academy of Management Perspectives. The overall goal of the Academy of Management journals is to serve the interests of the Academy's members, and the specific goal of the new Academy of Management Perspectives (AMP) is to publish accessible articles about important issues concerning management and business. AMP articles are aimed at the non-specialist academic reader, and should also be useful for teaching. Serving both these goals more effectively requires a change in strategy and direction for the journal. Going forward, Perspectives will concentrate on two types of articles aimed at this thought leader audience. The first are accessible surveys and reviews of contemporary knowledge about management and business issues. The goal would be to make information about empirical research in management accessible to the non-expert, including students, and the focus of the reviews would have to be on the phenomena of business and management, not the development of the academic literature.
The Academy of Management (the Academy; AOM) is a leading professional association for scholars dedicated to creating and disseminating knowledge about management and organizations. The Academy's central mission is to enhance the profession of management by advancing the scholarship of management and enriching the professional development of its members. The Academy is also committed to shaping the future of management research and education. Founded in 1936, the Academy of Management is the oldest and largest scholarly management association in the world. Today, the Academy is the professional home for more than 18290 members from 103 nations. Membership in the Academy is open to all individuals who find value in belonging.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005)
© 2002 Academy of Management
Request Permissions