THE ECONOMIC CRISIS, VIOLENT CONFLICT, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Cite this Item
Abstract
An adverse economic shock can be dangerous because its impact may be long-lived if countries are forced into a vicious cycle of low human development and conflict. Drawing on a review of both theoretical and empirical literature, this paper frames the connection between economic factors and conflict within a conceptual framework in which levels of human development and the risk of conflict are linked. While conflict might be caused by many factors, low levels of human development increase the risks of conflict outbreaks and recurrence. Conflict, in turn, destroys the accumulated physical, social and human capital. The linkage between conflict and human development may form a self reinforcing cycle. And consequently, policy measures to sustain human development would also have an additional indirect impact in lowering the risk of conflict.
Journal Information
The International Journal of Peace Studies is the journal of the International Peace Research Association. Spanning both qualitative and quantitative approaches, to issues of conflict and prospects for peace on multiple levels, it represents the leading edge of value-explicit, multi-disciplinary scholarship. The journal is rigorously peer-reviewed, with an acceptance rate hovering typically around 10:1. Members of its Editorial Board are all full Professors, from world-leading universities such as Oxford, Michigan and Dartmouth College. Over the years, it has published original research by some of the founding figures in the field, including Johan Galtung, Elise Boulding and John W Burton. It has also published original communications by leading figures in the broader global peace community, including Nelson Mandela, the Dalai Lama and other Nobel laureates.
Publisher Information
The International Peace Research Association (IPRA) has been pursuing interdisciplinary research into the most pressing issues related to sustainable peace around the world since 1964. As a network of scholars, practitioners and decision-makers from all continents, they strive to stay at the cutting edge of the state of the art of peace, and to build communities of inquiry with their five regional associations distributed around the world.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of JSTOR collection
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
International Journal of Peace Studies
© 2010 International Peace Research Association (IPRA)
Request Permissions