Since 1979, Iran's objectives in Afghanistan have changed as Afghanistan's domestic landscape changed. Still, Iran has consistently sought to see a stable and independent Afghanistan, with Herat as a buffer zone and with a Tehran-friendly government in Kabul, a government that reflects the rich ethnic diversity of the country. Toward those and other goals, Iran has created "spheres of influence" inside Afghanistan. During the Soviet occupation (1979-88), Iran created an "ideological sphere of influence" by empowering the Shi'ites. Iran then created a "political sphere of influence" by unifying the Dari/Persian-speaking minorities, who ascended to power. Iranian policies added fuel to the ferocious civil war in the 1990s. Astonishingly slow to recognize the threat posed by the Taliban, Iran helped create a "sphere of resistance" to counter the "Kabul-Islamabad-Riyadh" axis by supporting the Northern Alliance. Since the liberation of Afghanistan, Iran has also established an "economic sphere of influence" by engaging in the reconstruction of Afghanistan. Today, Iran's goals are to pressure the Afghan government to distance itself from Washington, and for Iran to become the hub for the transit of goods and services between the Persian Gulf and Afghanistan, Central Asia, India, and China. While Iran has been guilty of extremism and adventurism in some critical aspects of its foreign policy, its overall Afghan policy has contributed more to moderation and stability than to extremism and instability.
The Middle East Journal explores the region's political and economic development, cultural and literary heritage, and ethnic and religious diversity. Published quarterly since 1947, the peer-reviewed Journal provides objective research and analysis on the region, on the area from Morocco to Pakistan and including Central Asia. The Journal's articles and book reviews come from renowned scholars and foreign policy analysts, and present some of the most respected voices in the field of Middle Eastern studies. Its Chronology, continuously maintained since 1946, is a valuable resource for scholars and students. The Journal provides the background necessary for an understanding and appreciation of the region's political and economic development, cultural heritage, and ethnic and religious diversity.
The Middle East Institute (MEI) is a non-profit organization founded in 1946 by Middle East scholar George Camp Keiser and former Secretary of State Christian Herter. The Institute is located in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to "promote knowledge of the Middle East in America and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region." MEI is a non-partisan organization that does not take policy positions. In addition to publishing The Middle East Journal, MEI organizes regular programs and conferences; offers language training in Arabic, Hebrew, Persian, and Turkish; provides an intellectual home for a group of regional experts, whose writing and media appearances help to provide a balanced outlook on the region; houses the Oman Library, one of the largest Middle East collections outside of the Library of Congress; and publishes a wide variety of online-only publications on its website, http://www.mei.edu.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Middle East Journal
© 2006 Middle East Institute
Request Permissions