You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Voting Pattern in the Fourth General Election. I: D M K Success in Madras
N. S. Siddhartan
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 2, No. 24 (Jun. 17, 1967), pp. 1083+1085-1088
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4358065
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Political candidates, Congressional voting, Political parties, Constituents, Congressional districts, Congressional elections, Parliaments, Polls, Muslims
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Madras was one of the better administered States under the Congress. Why then was the Congress routed in the elections by the United Front with the DMK at its centre-piece? The Congress organisation was no match for the DMK whose sustained campaigning at the grass-roots level evoked a strong popular response, especially as memories of the linguistic disturbances of early 1965 were still fresh. But what turned the DMK's advantages into a resounding victory was its strategy of forging an electoral arrangement with the Swatantra and the CPI (M). This helped the DMK to enlist support which cut across caste and class alignments. The study of voting pattern attempted here brings out the depth of support for the United Front. A large proportion of its seats were won by overwhelming majorities. In ten of the fourteen districts, again, the United Front secured an absolute majority of the votes polled, a feat which the Congress failed to perform in even a single district. The analysis also shows that the United Front swept the polls in most of the major towns in the State and that the hold of the Congress on scheduled caste constituencies, traditionally Congress strongholds, has been lost. [This is the first of a series of articles on the voting pattern in the different States in the general elections.]
Economic and Political Weekly © 1967 Economic and Political Weekly