Modern understanding of the design of ancient buildings, sculptures, and other artifacts depends in part on being able to identify the system of linear measurement utilized at the time. But while numerous examples of measuring instruments and standards inscribed in stone have been recovered from the Egyptian and Roman periods in particular, the scarcity of documentary evidence for the Greek world is reflected in a bewildering and often conflicting range of opinion. The induction of metrical units from surveys, buildings, or urban layouts cannot provide unequivocal results, and consensus is accordingly lacking, both about the number of different feet used by the Greeks, and regarding their individual lengths. This paper focuses on the metrological relief recently discovered on the island of Salamis, which is only the second known example of its kind. On the basis of a fresh survey it can be shown that, contrary to previous discussion, the slab records the so-called Doric foot of ca. 327 mm, thus providing the first firm evidence for the very existence of this unit. An attempt is then made to reconstruct the original form of the relief on the basis of symmetry, leading to the hypothesis that first, despite differences, the proportions of the figure were governed by simple mathematical ratios comparable with those of Vitruvian Man, and second, the relief facilitated the comparison of the Doric foot with the socalled Attic foot and the Egyptian royal cubit by means of convenient conversion factors. The conclusion reviews the implications with regard to the study of the architecture of the Classical period.
Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.The American Journal of Archaeology (AJA) is published by the Archaeological Institute of America and in association with the University of Chicago Press. It was founded in 1885 and is one of the world’s most distinguished and widely distributed peer-reviewed archaeological journals. The AJA reaches more than 40 countries and approximately 700 universities, learned societies, departments of antiquities, and museums. The AJA regularly publishes open access content on itswebsite
Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
American Journal of Archaeology
© 2000 Archaeological Institute of America