In this paper the author examines the philological and archaeological evidence that techniques of softening ivory and manipulating its shape were employed by Pheidias and his successors in the production of monumental chryselephantine statues. Prior to the Classical period, gold and ivory images appear to have been constructed of individually carved ivory faces and limbs attached to bodies fashioned of wood and subsequently gilded. The colossal scale of the Athena Parthenos and Zeus Olympios, however, constituted considerable technical difficulties, for the exposed flesh of these statues far surpassed the size of any tusk. Greek and Latin authors suggest that by the mid-fifth century B. C., age-old techniques of furniture production had been developed to such a degree that tusks could be "unscrolled" into thin sheets of ivory with substantially larger dimensions than sectioned pieces; classical and medieval sources, moreover, preserve recipes for chemically softening ivory to shape it as desired. Unscrolled and softened ivories, examples of which are presented here, are extremely flexible and can be pressed into and formed by molds, procedures remarkably akin to those employed in wood-working, goldsmithing, and indirect lost-wax bronzecasting. Pheidias and his successors thus appear to have ingeniously adapted techniques employed in allied crafts to create their most celebrated statues in gold and ivory.
Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.The American Journal of Archaeology (AJA) is published by the Archaeological Institute of America and in association with the University of Chicago Press. It was founded in 1885 and is one of the world’s most distinguished and widely distributed peer-reviewed archaeological journals. The AJA reaches more than 40 countries and approximately 700 universities, learned societies, departments of antiquities, and museums. The AJA regularly publishes open access content on itswebsite
Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
American Journal of Archaeology
© 1997 Archaeological Institute of America