The Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies is the leading interdisciplinary journal on Asia, Africa and the Near and Middle East. It carries unparalleled coverage of the languages, cultures and civilisations of these regions from ancient times to the present. Publishing articles, review articles and communications of the highest academic standard, it also features an extensive and influential reviews section. The scope of the Bulletin is geographically wide-ranging and covers the following spectrum of disciplines: anthropology; archaeology; art; history; history of science and medicine; linguistics; literature; musicology; philosophy; religious studies.

Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.

Note: This article is a review of another work, such as a book, film, musical composition, etc. The original work is not included in the purchase of this review.

This item is part of JSTOR collection
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London © 1978 School of Oriental and African Studies
Request Permissions