Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning

Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld
The Yale Law Journal
Vol. 23, No. 1 (Nov., 1913), pp. 16-59
DOI: 10.2307/785533
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/785533
Page Count: 44
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 94 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    Bacon on Uses (Circa 1602; Rowe's ed. 1806), pp. 5-6
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Co. Lit. (1628) 272 b
    • Lewin, Trusts (12th ed., 1911), p. 11.
    • Maitland, Lectures on Equity (1909), pp. 43, 116.
  • 3
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Langdell, Classification of Rights and Wrongs (1900), 13Harv. L. Rev., 659, 673
    • (1887) 1Harv. L. Rev., 55, 60
    • Ibid. 58
    • Summary of Eq. Plead. (2nd ed., 1883) secs. 45, 182-184.
  • 4
    Ames, "Purchase for Value Without Notice" (1887), 1Harv. L. Rev., 1, 9
  • 5
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Lect. on Eq. (1909), 17, 18, 112
    • Maitland, Trust and Corporation (1904)
    • 3 Collected Papers, 321, 325
  • 7
    (2nd ed., 1907) p. 230
  • 8
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Walter G. Hart (author of "Digest of Law of Trusts"), The Place of Trust in Jurisprudence (1912)
    • 28Law Quart. Rev., 290, 296.
  • 9
    A. N. Whitlock, Classification of the Law of Trusts (1913), 1 Calif. Law Rev., 215, 218
  • 10
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Beale, Equitable Interests in Foreign Property, 20Harv. L. Rev. (1907), 382
    • Fall v. Eastin (1905), 75 Neb., 104
    • S. C. (1909), 215 U. S., 1, 14-15
    • Selover, Bates & Co. v. Walsh (1912), 226 U. S., 112
    • Bank of Africa Limited v. Cohen (1909), 2 Ch. 129, 143.
  • 11
    (1882) 20 Ch. D. 562, 580
  • 12
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ball v. Milliken (1910), 31 R. I., 36
    • 76 Atl., 789, 793
  • 13
    2 Hist. Eng. Law (2nd ed., 1905), 226.
  • 14
    Ibid., 124
  • 15
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1895) 67 Fed. Rep., 674, 677.
    • In re Fixen (1900), 102 Fed. Rep., 295, 296.
  • 16
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • 51 N. H., 504, 511.
    • Com- stock, J., in Wynehamner v. People (1856), 13 N. Y., 378, 396
    • Selden J., S. C., 13 N. Y., 378, 433-434
    • Ryan, C., in Law v. Rees Printing Co. (1894), 41 Neb., 127, 146
    • Magruder, J., in Dixon v. People (1897), 168 Ill., 179, 190.
  • 17
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1893) 116 Mo., 527, 533-534.
    • Doe, C. J., in Smith v. Fairloh (1894), 68 N. H., 123, 144-145.
  • 18
    2 Black. Com. (1765), 16-43.
  • 19
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Poll & Maitd. Hist. Eng. Law (2nd ed., 1905), Vol. II, p. 31
    • Ibid., p. 33
  • 20
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Waldo, C. J., in W~hite v. Multonomah Co. (1886), 13 Ore., 317, 323
    • Thayer, Prelim. Treat. Evid. (1898), p. 393
    • Holland, Jurisp (10th ed., 1906), 151
  • 21
    Illinois Steel Co. v. Ostrowski (1902), 194 Ill., 376, 384
  • 22
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • McCaughey v. Schuette (1897), 117 Cal., 223.
    • Rogers v. Milwaukee, 13 Wis., 610
    • Illinois Steel Co. v. Ostrowski, supra, note 21.
  • 24
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Lord Westbury, in Bell v. Kennedy (1868), L. R. 1 H. L. (Sc.), 307
    • Chief Justice Shaw, in Abinlgton v. Bridgewater (1840), 23 Pick., 170
  • 25
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Preliminary Treatise on Evidence (1898), p. 190
    • Ibid., pp. vii, 183, 189-190, 278, 306, 351, 355, 390-393.
    • Professor John Chipman Gray, in his Nature and Sources of the Law (1909), Pref. p. viii
    • Hyde v. United States (1911), 225 U. S., 347, 391
    • Field, J., in M1organ, v. Louiisiana (1876), 93 U. S., 217, 223
    • Peckham, J. in Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Tennessee (1895), 161 U. S., 174, 177, 178.
  • 26
    (1852) 7 How. Pr., 124, 130.
  • 27
    (1893) 54 Fed. Rep., 338, 348.
  • 28
    (1871) 3 Heisk. (Tenn.), 287, 306-307.
  • 29
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Atchison & Neb. R. Co. v. Baty (1877), 6 Neb., 37, 40.
    • San Francisco v. S. V. Water Co. ( ), 48 Cal., 531
    • Gilbert, Evid. (4th ed., 1777), 126
  • 30
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Kearns v. Cordwainers' Co. (1859), 6 C. B. N. S., 388, 409
    • The Thames Conservancy Act, 1857, 20 and 21 Vict. c. cxlvii., s. 179
    • Fearon v. Mitchell (1872), L. R. 7 Q. B., 690, 695
    • s. 50 of 21 and 22 Vict. c. 98
    • Cal. Civ. Code, sec. 648a
    • Tenn. Const. of 1834, Art. 9, sec. 7
  • 31
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1894) 10 Ind. App., 60
    • 37 N. E., 303, 304.
  • 32
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Howley Park Coal, etc., Co. v. L. & N. TrV. Ry. (1913), A. C. 11, 25, 27
    • Galveston, etc. Ry. Co. v'. Harrigan (1903), 76 S. W., 452, 453
  • 33
    (1883) 8 App. Cas., at p. 597.
  • 34
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Pearce v. Scotcher (1882), L. R. 9 Q. B., 162, 167
    • Quinn v. Leather (1901), A. C. 495 (passim)
    • Allen v. Flood (1898), A. C. 1 (passim)
    • Lindley v. Nat. Carbonic Acid Gas Co. (1910), 220 U. S., 61, 75
    • Smith v. Cornell Univ. (1894). 45 N. Y. Supp., 640, 643
    • Farnum v. Kern Valley Bk. (1910), 107 Pac., 568.
    • post, n. 38
  • 35
    El. Jurisp. (10th ed.), 83
  • 36
    Ibid., 82
  • 37
    Nat. and Sources of Law (1909), secs. 45, 184.
  • 38
    Ibid., sec. 48.
  • 40
    Lindley v. Nat. Carbonic Gas Co. (1910), 220 U. S., 61.
  • 41
    (1901) A. C., 495, 534.
  • 42
    post, pp. 38-44
  • 43
    Allen v. Flood (1898), A. C., 1.
  • 44
    (1889) 23 Q. B. D., 59.
  • 45
    This reference contains 10 citations:
    • Allen v. Flood (1898), A. C, 1
    • Hawkins, J., p. 16
    • Lord Halsbury, p. 84
    • Lord Ashbourne, p. 112
    • Quinn v. Leathern (1901), A. C., 495, 533
    • Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co (1910), 220 U. S., 61, 74
    • Robertson v. Rochester Folding Box Co. (1902), 171 N. Y., 538
    • Parker, C. J., p. 544
    • Wabash, St. L. & P. R. Co. v. Shacklet (1883), 105 Ill., 364, 389.
    • Purdy v. State (1901), 43 Fla., 538, 540
  • 46
    (Dropsie Tr.) secs. 196-197
  • 47
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Sohm's Institutes (Ledlies Tr., 3rd ed.), 28.
    • Rector, etc. of Christ Church v. Philadelphia (1860), 24 Hoew., 300, 301, 302.
  • 48
    Blades v Higgs (1865), 11 H. L. Cas., 621, 631
  • 49
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Humphrey v. Pegues (1872), 16 Wall., 244, 247
    • Smith v. Floyd (1893), 140 N. Y., 337, 342
    • Lonas v. State (1871). 3 Heisk., 287, 306,307
    • Territory v Stokes (1881), 2 N. M., 161, 169, 170
    • Ripley v. Knight (1878), 123 Mass., 515, 519
    • Dike v. State (1888), 38 Minn., 366
    • Re Miller (1893), 1 Q. B., 327.
    • WVisener v. Burrell (1911), 28 Okla., 546.
  • 50
    Louisville & N. R Co. v. Gaines (1880), 3 Fed. Rep., 266, 278
  • 51
    Hawkins, J., in Allen v. Flood (1898), A. C. 1, 20-21.
  • 52
    The Relations betwen Equity and Law, 11Mich. L. Rev., 537, 554, 556, 569
  • 53
    (1583) 9 Coke, 1.
  • 54
    (1898) A. C., 1, 19.
  • 55
    1896) 89 Me., 359.
  • 56
    (1856) 6 E. & B., 47. 74.
  • 57
    This reference contains 9 citations:
    • Borland v Boston (1882), 132 Mass., 89
    • Haimnilton v. Graham (1871), L. R. 2 H. L. (Sc.), 167, 169
    • Jones zv. De Moss (1911), 151 Ia., 112, 117
    • Kripp v. Curtis (1886), 71 Cal., 62, 63
    • Lamer v. Booth (1874), 50 Miss., 411, 413
    • Weller v. Brown (1911), Cal.,
    • 117 Pac., 517
    • Mathews v. People (1903), 202 Ill., 389,-401
    • Abington v. North Bridgewater (1840), 23 Pick., 170.
  • 58
    (1898) A. C., 1, 29.
  • 59
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Starey v. Graham (1899), 1 Q. B., 406, 411
    • Sir Frederick Pollock, in his volume on Jurisprudence (2nd ed., 1904), 62
    • Pollock, Essays in Jurisp. & Ethics (1882), Ch. I.
    • Thomas v. Sorrel (1673), Vaughan, 331, 351.
  • 60
    This reference contains 13 citations:
    • Dow v. Newborough (1728), Comyns, 242
    • Bourne v. Taylor (1808), 10 East., 189
    • Wickham v. Hawkes (1840), 7 M. & W., 63, 78-79
    • Quinn v. Leathem (1901), A. C. 495, 534
    • Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895), 157 U. S., 429, 652
    • Mathews v. People (1903), 202 Ill, 389, 401
    • Copyright Act, 8 Anne (1709) c. 19
    • ante p. 38, n. 48
    • Noy's Maxims (1641)
    • Blackstone (2 Com. 37)
    • S. F. Waterworks v. Schottler (1882), 62 Cal. 69, 106
    • Central R. & Banking Co. v. State (1875), 54 Ga., 401, 409.
    • Rex v. Halifax & Co. (1891), 2 Q. B., 263.
  • 61
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Pond v. Bates, 34 L. J. (N. S.), 406
    • Hamilton v. Graham (1871), L. R. 2 H. L. (Sc.), 166, 167
    • Attersoll v. Stevens (1808), 1 Taunt., 183
    • Wickham v. Hawker (1840), 7 M. & W., 63, 78-79.
  • 62
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1896) 12 App. Div., 17
    • 42 N. Y. Sup., 607, 609.
  • 63
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Thomas v. Sorrell (1673), Vaughan, 331, 351
    • Taylor v. Waters (1817), 7 Taunt., 374, 384
    • Heap v. Hartley (1889), 42 Ch. D., 461, 470.
  • 64
    Remington v. Parkins (1873), 10 R. I., 550, 553
  • 65
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • People v. Dikeman (1852), 7 Howard Pr., 124, 130
    • Lonas v. State (1871), 3 Heisk. (Tenn.), 287 ,306-307
    • Mabre v. Whittaker (1906), 10 Wash., 656, 663
    • St. Joseph Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Hanck (1876), 63 Mo., 112, 118.
  • 67
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Wynehamer v. People (1856), 13 N. Y., 378, 396
    • Bartemeyer v. Iowa (1873), 18 Wall., 129, 137
    • Low v. Rees Printing Co. (1894), 41 Neb., 127, 146
  • 68
    Hunt v. Rousmanier (1883), 8 Wheat., 173, 201.
  • 69
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Pope v. Nickerson (1844), 3 Story, 465, 473, 476, 481, 483
    • Lloyd v Guibert (1865), 6 B. & S., 100, 117
    • King v. Sarria (1877), 69 N. Y., 24, 28, 30-32
    • Risdon, etc., Works v. Furness (1905), 1 K. B. 304
    • (1906) 1 K. B. 49.
    • The Individual Liability of Stockholders and the Con- flict of Laws (1909), 9Columb. L. Rev., 492, 512, n. 46, 521, n. 71
    • 10 Columb. L. Rev., 542-544.
  • 70
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Milliken v. Pratt (1878), 125 Mass., 374
    • Freeman's Appeal (1897), 68 Conn., 533
  • 71
    Emery v. Clough (1885), 63 N. H., 552
  • 72
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Hudgens v. Chamberlain (1911), 161 Cal., 710, 713, 715.
    • Capital, etc., Bk. v. Rhodes (1903), 1 Ch. 631, 655
  • 73
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Carpenter v. Scott (1881), 13 R. I., 477, 479
    • Christensen v. Nelson (1901), 38 Or. 473. 477, 479
  • 74
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Davis zv. Clark (1897), 58 Kan. 100
    • 48 Pac., 563, 565
    • Leiter v. Pike (1889), 127 Ill., 287, 326
    • Welstur v. Trust Co. (1895), 145 N. Y., 275, 283
    • Furley v. Palmer (1870), 20 Oh. St., 223, 225.
  • 75
    Sugden, in his work on Powers (8th ed., 1861) 4
  • 76
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • S. Australia v. Abrahams, L. R. P. C., 265
    • Barlow v. Ross (1890), 24 Q. B. D., 381, 384.
  • 77
    Frost v. Knight (1872) L. R. 7 Ex. 111
  • 78
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Boston R. Co. v. Bartlett (1849), 3 Cush., 225
    • Ashley, Contr. (1911), 16 et. seq.
  • 79
    Langdell, Sum. Contr. (2nd ed., 1880), sec. 178.
  • 80
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ashley, Contr. (1911), 25 et seq.
    • R. L. McWilliams, Enforcement of Option Agreements (1913), 1Calif. Law Rev., 122.
  • 81
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • J'. G. Reese Co. Tv. House (1912), 162 Cal., 740, 745
    • Linn v. McLean (1885), 80 Ala., 360, 364
    • O'Brien v. Boland (1896), 166 Mass., 481, 483
    • Baker v. Shaw (1912), 68 Wash., 99 103
  • 83
    Keener, Quasi-Contr. (1893), p. 18.
  • 84
    (1892) 142 Ill., 388, 397.
  • 85
    1861) 16 Grat., 519, 525.
  • 86
    (1885) 63 N. H., 552.
  • 87
    (1873) 36 Ia., 224, 226.
  • 88
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Attorney General v. Sudeley (1896), 1 Q. B., 354, 359
    • Kroessin v. Keller (1895), 60 Minn., 372
  • 89
    (1892) 95 Cal., 317, 319.
  • 90
    Dougherty v. Creary (1866), 30 Cal', 290, 298.
  • 91
    (1895) 161 U.. S., 174, 177.
  • 92
    (1876) 93 U. S., 217, 222.
  • 93
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Picard v. Tennessee, etc., R. Co. (1888), 130 U. S., 637, 642
    • Rochester Railway Co. v. Rochester (1906) 205 U. S., 236, 252
    • Internal. & G. N. Ry. Co. v. State (1899), 75 Tex., 356
    • Sloss, J., in Smith v. Bougham (1909), 156 -Cal., 359, 365
  • 94
    Choate v. Trapp (1912), 224 U. S., 665.
  • 95
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Brearly School, Limited v. Ward (1911), 201 N. Y., 358
    • 94 N. E., 1001
    • Ann. Cas., 1912 B, 259
  • 96
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Internat. & G. N. Ry. Co. v. State (1899), 75 Tex., 356
    • ante, n. 91
  • 97
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Wilson v. Gaines (1877), 9 Baxt. (Tenn.), 546, 550- 551
    • Strahan z'. Wayne Co. (June, 1913), 142 N. W., 678, 680
  • 98
    (1677) 2 Swanst., 170.
  • 99
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Vacher 6& Sons, Limited v. London Society of Compositors (1913), A. C. -107, 118, 125
    • Baylies v. Bishop of London (1913), 1 Ch., 127, 139, 140
    • Poury v. Hordern (1900), 1 Ch., 492, 495
    • Sheridan v. Elden (1862), 24 N. Y., 281, 384.