Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The Effect of the Federal Safety Appliance Acts on Workmen's Compensation

The Yale Law Journal
Vol. 30, No. 7 (May, 1921), pp. 732-735
DOI: 10.2307/788289
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/788289
Page Count: 4
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 17 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Act of March 2, I893 (27 Stat. at L. 531)
    • Act of March 2, I903 (32 Stat. at L. 943)
    • Act of April I4, I9IO (36 Stat. at L. 299).
  • 2
    Ross v. Schooley (i9'9, C. C. A. 7th) 257 Fed. 9o.
  • 3
    Director General of Railroads v. Ronald (i920, C. C. A. 2d) 265 Fed. I38, i44.
  • 4
    N. Y. Central Ry. v. White (19I7) 243 U. S. i88, 20I, 37 Sup. Ct. 247, 252
  • 5
    Knowlton v. Moore (i900) 178 U. S. 41, 77, 20 Sup. Ct. 747, 76I
  • 6
    Texas & Pacific Jy. v. Rigsby (i9i6) 24I U. S. 33, 4I, 36 Sup. Ct. 842
  • 7
    Murray v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. (i894, N. D. Iowa) 62 Fed. 24, 42.
  • 8
    Smith v. Alabama (i888) i24 U. S. 465, 478, 8 Sup. Ct. 564, 569
  • 10
    United States v. Ferger (I919) 250 U. S. 199, 39 Sup. Ct. 445.
  • 11
    Smith v. Alabama, supra note 9, at p. 477
  • 12
    N. Y. Central Ry. v. Tonsellito (1917) 244 U. S. 360, 362, 37 Sup. Ct. 620, 62i
  • 13
    Postal Tel. Co. v. Warren (I919) 251 U. S. 27, 40 Sup. Ct. 69.
  • 14
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Haber (i898) i69 U. S. 6I3, i8 Sup. Ct. 488
    • Reid v. Colorado (i902) i87 U. S. 137, 23 Sup. Ct. 92
    • Savage v. Jones (I9I2) 225 U. S. 501, 32 Sup. Ct. 7I5
    • Atlantic Coast Line Ry. v. Georgia (1914) 234 U. S. 280, 34 Sup. Ct. 82
    • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Haber, supra
    • Savage v. Jones, supra
  • 15
    N. Y. Central Ry. v. White, supra note 4.
  • 16
    Pennsylvania Ry. v. Hughes (1903) 191 U. S. 477, 488, 24 Sup. Ct. 132, 135
  • 17
    Ross v. Schooley, supra note 2.
  • 18
    Brandeis, J., dissenting, in N. Y. Central Ry. v. Winfield (09I7) 244 U. S. 147, i68, 37 Sup. Ct. 546, 555.