Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Constitutional Methods of Regulating Jitneys

The Yale Law Journal
Vol. 31, No. 2 (Dec., 1921), pp. 183-187
DOI: 10.2307/789307
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/789307
Page Count: 5
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item
Constitutional Methods of Regulating Jitneys
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 28 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Hadacheck (1913) i65 Calif. 4I6, 132 Pac. 584
    • (1918) 31HARV. L. REV.1034.
  • 2
    Public Service Commission v. Booth (1915) 170 App. Div. 590, I56 N. Y. SUPP. 140.
  • 3
    L. R. A. i9i8 F, 475, note.
  • 4
    Freund, Police Power (1904) secs. 643-644.
  • 5
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • State v. Porter (I92O) 94 Conn. 639, iIo AtI. 59
    • Ingham v. Brooks (I920) 95 Conn. 3I7, iii Ati. 209
    • (1916) 16COL. L. REV.345
    • COMMENTS (1920) 30 YALE LAW JOURNAL, 171.
  • 6
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Buttfield v. Stranwhan (I904) 192 U. S. 470, 24 Sup. Ct. 349
    • Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich Transit Co. (1912) 224 U. S. 194, 32 SUP. Ct 436
    • State v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry. (I908) 56 Fla. 617, 47 So. 969
    • Cheadle, Delegation of Legislative Functions (i9I8) 27YALE LAW JOURNAL, 892.
  • 7
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • 0'Neil v. Fire Insurance Co. (i895) i66 Pa. 72, 30 Atl. 943
    • Fite v. State (1905) II4 Tenn. 646, 88 S. W. 941
    • State v. Gt. Northern Ry. (1907) IOO Minn. 445, III N. W. 289.
  • 8
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Yick Wo v. Hopkins (i886) ii8 U. S. 356, 6 Sup. Ct. Io64.
    • Noble v. Douglas (192I, W. D. Wash.) 274 Fed. 672.
  • 9
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Blunt v. Shepardson (I9I8) 286 Ill. 84, 12I N. E. 263
    • COMMENTS (I919) 28YALE LAW JOURNAL, 692.
  • 10
    Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville, etc. Ry. (1913) 227 U. S. 88, 33 SUP. Ct. i85.
  • 11
    State v. Conlon (i895) 65 Conn. 478, 486, 33 Atl. 5I9, 521.
  • 12
    Wallace v. Reno (I903) 27 Nev. 71, 73 Pac. 528.
  • 13
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Lieberman v. Van De Carr (1905) 199 U. S. 552, 26 Sup. Ct. i44
    • COMMENTS (1919) 28YALE LAW JOURNAL, 391.
  • 14
    Durand v. Dyson (I9IS) 27I I11. 382, iII N. E. I43.
  • 15
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ex parte Dickey (19I5) 76 W. Va. 576, 85 S. E. 78i
    • Schoenfeld v. City of Seattle (i920, W. D. Wash.) 265 Fed. 726.
  • 16
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Hadfield v. Lundin (1917) 98 Wash. 657, i68 Pac. 5i6
    • Peters v. San Antonio (1917, Tex. Civ. App.) I95 S. W. 989.
  • 17
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • City of Memphis v. State (i9i5) 133 Tenn. 83, 179 S. W. 631
    • Huston v. Des Moines (i9i6) I76 Iowa, 455, i56 N. W. 883
    • Cummins v. Jones (i9i6) 79 Or. 276, I55 Pac. I7I
    • McGlothern v. City of Seattle (i921, Wash.) i99 Pac. 457.
  • 18
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Jitney Bus Association v. City of Wilkes-Barre (19I7) 256 Pa. 462, I00 Atl. 954
    • Curry v. Osborne (I9I8) 75 Fla. 85, 79 So. 293
    • Parrish v. Richmond (I9I6) II9 Va. i8o, 89 S. E. I02.
  • 19
    Public Service Commission v. Booth, supra note 2.
  • 20
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Wilson v. Eureka City (i899) I73 U. S. 32, I9 Sup. Ct. 3I7
    • Cicero Lumber Co. v. Cicero (I898) 176 I11. 9, 5I N. E. 758.
  • 21
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Davis v. Massachusetts (I897) I67 U. S. 43, I7 SUp. Ct. 73I
    • State v. Coleman (I92I, Conn.) II3 AtI. 385.
  • 22
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Matter of Frazee (i886) 63 Mich. 396, 30 N. W. 72
    • Freund, op. cit. secs. 643-644
  • 23
    Pub. Acts, I1921, ch. 77.
  • 24
    Rev. Sts. i9i8, sec. 3828.
  • 25
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Stevens v. Connecticut Co. (I9I2) 86 Conn. 36, 84 AtI. 36i.
    • State v. Board of Dental Examiners (0905) 38 Wash. 325, 8o Pac. 544.
    • Amperse v. City of Kalamazoo (i886) 59 Mich. 78, 26 N. W. 222
    • Board of Dental Examiners v. People (i887) I23 Ill. 227, 13 N. E. 201
    • Thomp- son v. Koch (i895) 98 Ky. 400, 33 S. W. 96.
    • Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. v. Minnesota (i890) 134 U. S. 4i8, I0 Sup. Ct 702.
  • 26
    Supra note 21.
  • 27
    Supra notes 20 and 21.
  • 28
    LeBlanc v. City of New Orleans (19i5) i38 La. 243, 70 SO. 2I2.