This paper investigates the theoretical and empirical reasons why Japan leads the world in adoption of ISO 14001, while the US lags, and the comparative effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance of adopters in both countries. Findings suggest that institutional barriers to adoption are much higher in the adversarial policy climate of the US than in the more reciprocal policy climate of Japan. Expected benefits of adoption are lower than the reported realisation, and this finding is significant for some categories such as competitive market advantage and relationships with regulators. Findings regarding the effect of ISO on environmental performance are mixed, but generally point to a relatively limited effect. We conclude that, even if ISO 14001 has a moderate effect on firm environmental action, the structural barriers in the US generally limit the viability of these types of voluntary policy.
First published in 1993, Greener Management International: The Journal of Corporate Environmental Strategy and Practice (GMI) is the leading quarterly management journal drawing together strategic environmental and sustainability issues as they affect organisations worldwide. GMI enjoys a global reputation for innovation, readability and quality. With an international Editorial Board of over thirty professional and academic experts, GMI maintains rigorous standards for contributions. Following the continued success of its themed issues, GMI now focuses entirely on producing four theme issues a year. These innovative, cutting-edge editions have been widely praised and provide subscribers with unique global perspectives on the issues that matter in corporate sustainability.
Building on two centuries' experience, Taylor & Francis has grown rapidlyover the last two decades to become a leading international academic publisher.The Group publishes over 800 journals and over 1,800 new books each year, coveringa wide variety of subject areas and incorporating the journal imprints of Routledge,Carfax, Spon Press, Psychology Press, Martin Dunitz, and Taylor & Francis.Taylor & Francis is fully committed to the publication and dissemination of scholarly information of the highest quality, and today this remains the primary goal.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
© 2003 Greenleaf Publishing