Skip to Main Content
Have library access? Log in through your library
Divided Unions

Divided Unions: The Wagner Act, Federalism, and Organized Labor

Alexis N. Walker
Copyright Date: 2020
Pages: 200
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv16t6chj
  • Cite this Item
  • Book Info
    Divided Unions
    Book Description:

    A comparative history of public and private sector unions from the Wagner Act of 1935 until today

    The 2011 battle in Wisconsin over public sector employees' collective bargaining rights occasioned the largest protests in the state since the Vietnam War. Protestors occupied the state capitol building for days and staged massive rallies in downtown Madison, receiving international news coverage. Despite an unprecedented effort to oppose Governor Scott Walker's bill, Act 10 was signed into law on March 11, 2011, stripping public sector employees of many of their collective bargaining rights and hobbling government unions in Wisconsin. By situating the events of 2011 within the larger history of public sector unionism, Alexis N. Walker demonstrates how the passage of Act 10 in Wisconsin was not an exceptional moment, but rather the culmination of events that began over eighty years ago with the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935.

    Although explicitly about government unions, Walker's book argues that the fates of public and private sector unions are inextricably linked. She contends that the exclusion of public sector employees from the foundation of private sector labor law, the Wagner Act, firmly situated private sector law at the national level, while relegating public sector employees' efforts to gain collective bargaining rights to the state and local levels. She shows how private sector unions benefited tremendously from the national-level protections in the law while, in contrast, public sector employees' efforts progressed slowly, were limited to union-friendly states, and the collective bargaining rights that they finally did obtain were highly unequal and vulnerable to retrenchment. As a result, public and private sector unions peaked at different times, preventing a large, unified labor movement. The legacy of the Wagner Act, according to Walker, is that labor remains geographically concentrated, divided by sector, and hobbled in its efforts to represent working Americans politically in today's era of rising economic inequality.

    eISBN: 978-0-8122-9666-2
    Subjects: Labor & Employment Relations, History, American Studies

Table of Contents

Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
  1. Front Matter
    (pp. [i]-[vi])
  2. Table of Contents
    (pp. [vii]-[viii])
  3. Chapter 1 Introduction
    (pp. 1-16)

    On February 14, 2011, Governor Scott Walker introduced his self-proclaimed “bud get repair” bill in the Wisconsin state legislature that would strip most public sector employees of their collective bargaining rights. Opposition to the bill represented one of the largest, most sustained protests since the Vietnam War. For more than three weeks from February to March 2011, protestors peacefully occupied the Wisconsin State Capitol, sleeping on the hard marble floors for days on end to oppose the bill. The state house occupiers had traveled from across the country, and supporters nationwide called local Madison restaurants to arrange for pizza and...

  4. Chapter 2 The Wagner Act: A Critical Exclusion
    (pp. 17-30)

    To understand labor’s comparative weakness and the distinct paths of public and private sector unions in the United States, we must begin with the 1935 National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Also known as the Wagner Act, the NLRA was a cornerstone of New Deal legislation and the foundation for modern-day private sector labor law. The Wagner Act provided federal protections to private sector workers’ efforts to unionize, outlined anti-union practices employers could no longer utilize, and put in place the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to oversee union representation elections, adjudicate complaints, and interpret the Act in subsequent cases.

    The...

  5. Chapter 3 After Wagner (1936–1960): Life Without Collective Bargaining Rights
    (pp. 31-52)

    The years immediately after passage of the Wagner Act vividly illustrate how the law served as a crucial turning point for organized labor. For private sector unions, the late 1930s and 1940s were a period of tremendous growth and development facilitated by the Act. As one union leader explained at the time, the law was “a terrific spur to the workers” because “to the vigor of the organizing drive, to the encouragement of victories, of strides taken, to the prestige of the C.I.O., is now added the sanction of law, the often effective support of the Labor Relations Board, the...

  6. Chapter 4 1961: The Public Sector’s Watershed Moment
    (pp. 53-64)

    While private sector labor law reached an impasse following Taft-Hartley, after decades of effort, major changes were creating a window of opportunity for public sector laws to pass at the state and local levels (Kingdon 1984). Public sector employees drove the change by pressing for recognition of their grievances and defiantly organizing and joining unions regardless of legal provisions, forcing policymakers to take notice. During and after World War II, public sector employment increased as the New Deal expanded the size and scope of local, state, and federal government. The number of state employees rose from 804,000 in 1946 to...

  7. Chapter 5 The 1970s: Labor Out of Alignment
    (pp. 65-94)

    When Scott Walker introduced his “bud get repair bill” in 2011 to strip many public sector workers in Wisconsin of their collective bargaining rights, he privately alluded at the time that he was specifically targeting government employees rather than all union members as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy (Stein and Marley 2013, 47). Walker was so confident in his strategy and the lack of genuine solidarity within the labor movement that he did not expect that private sector unions would mobilize on behalf of their public sector brethren to challenge the bill (51). Although Walker’s intuition about private...

  8. Chapter 6 The Late 1970s to the 2010s: Labor on the Decline
    (pp. 95-113)

    By the close of the 1970s and into the early 1980s, the possibility of an expanding, transformative public/private sector labor movement was coming to an end. Just as economic changes like deindustrialization and expanding global markets were putting increased pressure on unionized workplaces, the legal environment was making it difficult for organized labor to adapt to changing circumstances. The next several decades were marked by a labor movement struggling to adapt and survive in the face of mounting difficulties and a constrained legal/institutional regime. The legal framework established in 1935 put in place the foundation for the challenges the labor...

  9. Chapter 7 The 2010s: The Modern Assault Against Public Sector Unions
    (pp. 114-129)

    The 2011 battle over Act 10 in Wisconsin was the most public struggle over public sector collective bargaining rights in decades, but it was not unique. Act 10 was part of a surge of legislation proposed across the country seeking to scale back government employees’ collective bargaining rights in the 2010s. The preceding decades had seen moments of expanded public sector rights—state workers gained collective bargaining rights in Indiana in 1989 and Washington in 2002, for instance—but also retrenchment—New Mexico’s Public Employee Labor Relations Act renewal was vetoed by the governor in 1999,¹ and Indiana’s state workers’...

  10. Chapter 8 Conclusion: The Consequences of Labor’s Enduring Divide
    (pp. 130-146)

    In October 1953, the “Trade Union and Collective Bargaining Rights of Public Employees” conference was held in Munich, Germany. The conference brought together public sector labor leaders from Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Holland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, and the United States. In his opening remarks at the conference, General Secretary M. C. Bolle of the International Federation of Unions of Employees in Public and Civil Services commented on the state of trade union rights around the world. He noted that in his travels he had discovered that many countries in Asia and Latin America that were...

  11. Appendix: Interview Method Description
    (pp. 147-150)
  12. Notes
    (pp. 151-156)
  13. Bibliography
    (pp. 157-174)
  14. Index
    (pp. 175-182)
  15. Acknowledgments
    (pp. 183-184)